Informalsurveyofprisoners
From Peaceful Beginnings
Informal Survey of Prisoners Reflects Variety of Attitudes about Infant Circumcision
The following letter was a result of this individual requesting information from Rosemary about infant circumcision:
"I was amazed at (the) thought of circumcision being child abuse. I chuckled at it and mentioned it to friends. Surprisingly they agreed with you. It was suggested that I bring (the idea) to some meetings here. I am involved with the Sex Offender’s Program in the Mental Health Unit at Somers Prison. So I did and got the following results:
Child Molesters and Incest (Adolescent and Pre-pubic ages): These thought the idea was ridiculous. None accepted the idea and felt it was a waste of time to bring it up. After 20 minutes they voted to let the issue die and end discussion. I guess I thought as I did, as my crime fits into this group.
Victimization Group (victims of sexual assault as children): Agreed wholeheartedly. One even mentioned on his own your group’s conviction – each person has the right to decide (about the alteration of his body) and the child should decide when old enough. There were very strong feelings in favor of that. I had to end the discussion after one hour, but could have gone on as there were still lots of feelings and ideas.
Rapists: Agreed. There was an open discussion. Feelings were not as forceful as they were with the victimization group, but there was general agreement all around.
Murder, sexual basis: Many were very strong against circumcision. There were many emotions and arguments in favor of not having a child cut.
Victims of Rape: Two married people with children both said "never again" would they put a kid through it. Strong feelings were expressed. Only one rapist who saw his son have anesthesia didn’t agree with pain (i.e. the idea that circumcision is painful. – ed.) He wasn’t sure of the reasons for his objections. He had no feelings either way, but would probably choose not to with any future sons.
I couldn’t visit the Parents Anonymous groups. I would have liked to have presented the idea to them and the Child Abuse (physical) group, but couldn’t.
Each group has a maximum of 18 members. No accurate, scientific survey was attempted. Approximately half of each group got involved. No attempt was made to draw the others out. I just presented the idea of circumcision being child abuse and opened it for discussion. No leadership or direction was offered in the group.
(Personal correspondence with Rosemary Romberg)


